Vital Iris Invention Licensing and Sales
These are challenging times for inventors, licensee’s and manufacturers. No ones quite sure how the United States, let alone other countries economies are going to do in the near future.
Patents and all that goes with them will be revamped soon. Trump is expected by many to clean house at the Patent Office at some point. It’s history is a long and sordid tale.
But that is but one of many concerns of inventors. Some of the others are alluded to in the following.
On Dec. 07, 1942, President Roosevelt confiscated over 50,000 patents of inventors from all countries with the Axis powers and countries they occupy.
On Sep. 22, 1994, The Common Law Institute of Intellectual Property Limited (UK) was reorganized as The Intellectual Property Law Institute; Sir Geoffrey Pattie was appointed Chairman of the Board of Governors with Sir Robin Nicholson, Sir Alfred Shepperd, Sir David Walker and (Sir) Stephen Stewart. In short, the Privy Council took full control over the organization. {The Privy Council formally advises the sovereign on the exercise of the royal prerogative}
On May 17, 2006, SERCO acquired first contract from the U.S. Patent Office to process the patent applications of AMERICAN inventors.
On Nov. 30, 2015, SERCO awarded a $95 million contract with the U.S. Patent Office to process American patents.
One hundred years into Cecil Rhodes’ 200-year Manifesto, the British Crown, via the American Senior Executive Service (SES) that employed Mega Warlord Andrew W. Marshall and SERCO, has been given full control of America’s most valuable intellectual property assets — the U.S. Patent Office.
The Patent Office let’s face it, is not exactly or even approximately friendly to inventors. It’s predatory and needs immediate reformation. We are in a time of transition out of the criminals hands and back into the inventors. Meanwhile we still are moving forward but with wounds and disabilities relative to our dealings with the patent office. We are now awake and wary.
Excerpt from an article I found online — The title of the article is somewhat ridiculous: “Chris Coons Working to Install Business-Friendly Candidate for Key Patent Position.” Being “pro-patent” is not “pro-business.” Patents and patent trolls are quite frequently anti-business. They are anti-competitive, and frequently anti-innovation — being used to stop, block, and suppress the companies who actually make stuff (or make stuff better). It’s not pro-business to be pro-patent. It’s pro-monopoly, and pro-patent lawyer.
Joe: I’m not sure what to do about all this but we will figure it out. More likely, it will be a matter of what will we BE to create an answer to a mutual win?
If your looking to buy or license new products you can contact me. I am NOT inclined to give my ideas, products away to predators so if that is how you operate with inventors, call someone else. Otherwise,… welcome. Let’s talk.
Government patent use law is a statute codified at 28 USC § 1498(a) that is a "form of government immunity from patent claims." Section 1498 gives the federal government of the United States the "right to use patented inventions without permission, while paying the patent holder 'reasonable and entire compensation' which is usually "set at ten percent of sales or less". This statute "allows federal agencies and third party government contractors to manufacture and/or use any invention without authorization from the patent holder. The federal government's rights are without an obligation for prior negotiation." Although Congress has the right to waive sovereign immunity for alleged patent infringement claims under the 'government patent use' statute, there are limits to the patent holder's recourse in the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Perhaps it’s time we just sought a creative and fair compensation agreement between us.
How can we simplify this whole process? Greed complicates, Mutual benefit grows agreements. Trust once built can carry the day. Fear delays. Cooperation pays.
